A selection of recent media reports

Port security clash is all about money, insists MSP
THE row over the decision by the UK Border Agency (UKBA) to axe three port posts at Stranraer and.
The Scotsman (09-Sep-2010)
Conservatives - Reforming the UK's Immigration System
Immigration minister Damian Green confirmed last night that the government will look at...
News on News (09-Sep-2010)
IMMIGRATION: £100M JETS BILL FOR DEPORTING FAILED ASYLUM SEEKERS
DEPORTING failed asylum seekers has cost Britain £100million, with many sent home on...
Daily Star (09-Sep-2010)
£100 million spent on asylum deportation flights
The Government spent more than £100 million on flights deporting failed asylum seekers,...
The Independent (08-Sep-2010)
Bogus colleges 'used as cover for illegal immigration'
A doctor and a solicitor set up two fake colleges to help illegal immigrants gain leave to remain.
Telegraph - Fashion (08-Sep-2010)
ASYLUM: COVER-UP OVER GROWING BACKLOG OF CASES
IMMIGRATION officials were last night accused of covering up a massive backlog of asylum claims...
Express.co.uk (08-Sep-2010)
Agency 'Manipulating' Asylum Figures
The Border Agency is struggling to cope with its asylum caseload and is only removing around 3%...
Sky News (07-Sep-2010)
Top adviser warns over proposed immigration cap
BBC News home affairs correspondent A top government adviser says ministers may need to stop...
BBC News UK (07-Sep-2010)
Illegal workers found at Haydock racecourse
THREE Indian men were being held after immigration officials raided a Merseyside...
Liverpool Daily Post (07-Sep-2010)
Police chief slams immigration cuts
A top police officer has criticised a move to cut funding for three posts tackling illegal...
Carrick Gazette (07-Sep-2010)
Britons lead on hostility to migrants
More than six out of 10 Britons believe immigration to the UK is spoiling the quality of life, suggesting that the Briti...
Financial Times (07-Sep-2010)
Immigration rules will help stop extremist exploitation, says Damian Green
Tougher immigration rules will make it harder for extremist parties to exploit the issue,..
Telegraph.co.uk (07-Sep-2010)
Quentin Letts - Yesterday In Parliament: Would John Prescott make sense to any snooper?
Our beloved MPs returned for the tiresome two-week September sitting and promptly spent the day.
Mail Online (07-Sep-2010)
The crimewave that shames the world
It's one of the last great taboos: the murder of at least 20,000 women a year in the name of...
The Independent (07-Sep-2010)
Immigration lessons
Telegraph View: The points-based system introduced by the last government has failed to put the...
Telegraph.co.uk (06-Sep-2010)
France to strip nationality for killing police: Sarkozy
President Nicolas Sarkozy said Monday he wants to strip French nationality from immigrants if...
Yahoo! News UK & Ireland (06-Sep-2010)
EU ministers vow migration cooperation
Description -- (PARIS) - Six EU governments and Canada vowed Monday to boost cooperation in...
EUbusiness.com (06-Sep-2010)
Immigration minister calls for tougher look at visa qualifications
The UK needs to look harder at who is qualifying for visas after research showed more than a...
Telegraph.co.uk (06-Sep-2010)
Govt to announce student visas crackdown
The government is to outline a crackdown on people arriving on student visas Monday as it bids to.
Yahoo! News UK & Ireland (06-Sep-2010)

Policy, Amnesty & Voting 11.19

Family Visitor Appeals

Summary

1. The number of family visitor appeals has increased eight fold, to over a thousand a week, since charges were abolished in 2002. The cost has reached approximately £1 million a week. The definition of family visitor is so wide that it could include as many as 120 relatives of a middle aged person in Britain. The definition should be tightened, charges re-imposed and bonds should be made an option (paragraph 11).

Introduction

2. The Immigration Appeals Act 1969 and the Immigration Act 1971 granted Rights of Appeal against a wide range of immigration decisions, including refusals to grant entry clearance. However, the Asylum and Immigration Appeals Act 1993 removed appeal rights for rejected visitors and short term students.

3. In October 2000, following disquiet, particularly in the Asian and Black communities, that family members were being refused visit visas without appropriate remedy, the Right of Appeal against refusal of visitors visas for "family visitors" was re-instated under the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999. Fees were originally set at £500 for an oral hearing or £150 for an appeal without a hearing. In January 2001 these fees were reduced to £125 and £50 but in May 2002 the fees were abolished entirely.

Definition of a family visitor

4. For these purposes a family visitor is defined in Section 90 (1) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 as any of the following persons:

(a) the applicant's spouse, father, mother, son, daughter, grandfather, grandmother, grandson, granddaughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece or first cousin. In these Regulations "first cousin" means, in relation to a person, the son or daughter of his uncle or aunt;09.

(b) the father, mother, brother or sister of the applicant's spouse;

(c) the spouse of the applicants son or daughter;

(d) the applicants stepfather, stepmother, stepson, stepdaughter, stepbrother or stepsister; or

(e) a person with whom the applicant has lived as a member of an unmarried couple for at least two of the three years before the day on which his application for entry clearance was made.

5. This definition of family visitor is so widely drawn that somebody from a third world country where the number of children per family is often four or five, could sponsor somewhere between 80 and 120 people under this scheme (Annex A). Furthermore, the provision for unmarried couples is particularly hard to verify and is therefore open to abuse.

6. A "family visitor" can generally appeal against refusal even if the applicant intends to do something else also during the trip. The legislation does not specify that visiting a family member has to be the sole, main or primary purpose of the trip. Nor does the sponsor have to be settled in the UK so someone still seeking asylum can sponsor a “family visitor”.

7. The number of family visitor appeals has increased eight fold, to over a thousand a week, since fees were abandoned as the following table shows [1] [2] :

2000200120022003/42004/52005/62006/72007/8
1374,3667,99716,88430,64358,49550,06564,669

8. Of particular concern is the rapid growth of applications from certain countries. In 2006 India, Pakistan and Nigeria produced over ¼ million applications - up by a factor of 16 over a period of four years. 175,000 were approved. In 2008 applications from these three countries totalled 197,000 of which 134,000 were approved.[3] The worldwide total in 2008 was 414,000 of which 312,000 were approved.[4]

a) the definition of "family" is extremely wide, such as to include 50 - 120 relatives each.

b) The government’s failure to remove those who stay beyond their visas must by now be well known.

c) It must also be widely known to relatives overseas that embarkation controls are due to be introduced in a few years time.

d) Talk of an amnesty for illegals can only encourage people to take a chance.

e) Those who are refused can appeal at the British tax payers expense.

Cost

10. The average unit cost of an Asylum and Immigration Tribunal Appeal in the financial year 2005/6 from receipt to final decision was £762. This figure represents the average unit cost of administration for all types of appeal before the tribunal and includes judicial costs, accommodation and the cost of providing an interpreter at the appeal hearing where this is necessary [5] . On this basis the cost of family visitor appeals in 2007/8 was £50 million. Even this is lower than an estimate of £60 million reported to be that of the Minister of Immigration.[6]

Proposed Changes

11. Given that there is no recording of visitors as they arrive and depart, there is no way of knowing whether those originally admitted as "family visitors" have left the UK, we propose that:

(a) The definition of “family visitor” should be substantially tightened, at least until embarkation controls are in place. In particular, uncles, aunts, nephews, nieces and first cousins should no longer be included. This would reduce the number of eligible relatives by up to 68.

(b) Fees should be re-instated at the original levels. There is no reason why the British tax payer should pay the costs of appeals by foreign visitors.

(c) The right to sponsor family visitors should be confined to British citizens. The relatives of others should apply as ordinary visitors.

(d) There should be provision for sponsors to deposit a bond in cases of doubt. The bond would be repaid as soon as the visitor reported back to the issuing Consulate.

2 January, 2010

Notes

  1. Parliamentary Answer 5 July 2006 Col 333 –4 W and Parliamentary Answer 84607 12 July 2006
  2. Hansard 23 March 2009 Col 175 W
  3. Parliamentary Answer 20 July 2009 Col 920 W
  4. Hansard 26 March 2009 Col 649 W
  5. House of Commons reply to Mr Pelling [91629]
  6. Sunday Observer 3 Feb 2008 , Nicholas Watt’s interview with Liam Byrne.
Annex A

Based on an average family sizes of 4 and 5 children per family a person resident in the UK could have up to 81 and 120 eligible family members in their country of origin, made up as follows:

Based on 4 childrenBased on 5 childrenNotes
Parents22
Grandparents44
Uncles/Aunts68Each parent has 3 or 4 siblings
First cousins24404/5 children for each uncle/aunt
Brothers/sisters34
Nieces/Nephews12204/5 children of each brother/sister
Children45
Children's spouses45
Grandchildren1625
Spouse11
Spouse's brother/sister34
Spouse's parents22
Total81120